🔗 Share this article

A surprising contact on LinkedIn. A proposal of employment from a headhunter, probably a female agent, based in China. The chance to make perhaps £20,000 part-time writing a small number of political analyses for a firm from China peppered with confidential or privileged information. Payment in cryptocurrency or physical money preferred.

It may seem obvious, on this telling, that an element about this approach would be suspicious. Nevertheless, China’s powerful intelligence agency continues to view it worthwhile to use recruitment consultants to attempt this – prompting the domestic spy agency to issue multiple warnings about their activity on the internet.

Massive Contact Attempts on Professional Networks

Last year, the head of MI5 Ken McCallum said Chinese agents were approaching Britons on LinkedIn on an unprecedented level, at a frequency of ten thousand over the preceding 30-month period, seeking political, industrial, defense and technological secrets. But a fresh initiative targeting elected officials and parliament has prompted the spy agency to take further action.

A spying alert was distributed on Tuesday via the administrative teams of the Commons speaker and his Lords counterpart: a single slide after the repeated efforts of certain individuals and Amanda Qiu to reach out to MPs, peers, their staffers, economic experts, research organizations – anybody who might provide information.

Intelligence Strategy and Legal Updates

In the curious manner of UK security services, there was no official release of the protective guidance from MI5 or the interior ministry. Yet the service was aware its briefing note would become public once it was sent electronically out to parliament. Republishing it in the press assists the general population better identify interactions with a deceptive intent.

The alert has the effect of uncovering more information from in and around Westminster, although that is not MI5’s primary purpose. The agency wants public figures to understand that just because interactions on LinkedIn are less overtly risky as on X or Facebook, it does not mean they are completely safe.

Nor is domestic spy agency understood to have been responding to any specific incident in parliament, although the burst of activity does come after the awkward collapse of the legal case of a former parliamentary aide Christopher Cash and his associate Christopher Berry on a technicality earlier in the autumn.

Both individuals had been charged of working for China – a charge they denied – but failure to successfully conclude a trial under the now repealed previous legislation led to warnings that British democracy had been left unprotected.

Updated Laws and Beijing's Long-Term Interests

Legislation has since been updated, and the MI5 slide contains a reminder of its successor: “Individuals involved in espionage activity face substantial legal consequences under the National Security Act.” It is a crime if somebody engages in conduct that is or is likely to “significantly help a overseas spy agency”.

An obvious question, though, is what China has to achieve. A politician who is outside ministerial roles will have restricted access of classified material, and an contact of theirs even less. Yet the Chinese government is also interested in the legislative body: for a time, in 2020 and 2021, the UK’s approach to China on issues such as the telecom firm or the human rights situation or genocide was being influenced by MPs.

Cultural Variations and Persistent Cyber Threats

In part there are cultural differences too. Autocratic regimes like Beijing's export information gathering methods and the size of its intelligence apparatus is enormous, employing three hundred thousand people. A former US official, a American cybersecurity head under president Joe Biden, said it was sometimes estimated that “China have more English speakers involved in this than Western agencies have personnel with language skills”.

The Chinese government is prepared to cultivate people over the long term and at times even the intelligence services have found it difficult to distinguish between legitimate relationships and spying. “Beijing has a low threshold for what information is considered to be of value,” the minister responsible a government official told MPs on this week, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may result in someone rapidly marginal becomes significant.

An alternative perspective to think about the continuous activities at secret intelligence collection is in the broader framework of the international competition between China and the Western nations at a level below the level of outright war. The nation has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the one campaign penetration of communications systems in 80 countries, and the another operation compromise of millions internet devices.

Beijing is involved in persistent attempts to identify secret informants on British democracy via digital means because it wants to be provocative, to display influence and because it can.